Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:48

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are the advantages of forming strategic partnerships?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Mahmoud Khalil vows to continue protests after release from detention - Politico
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
How to draft a will to avoid becoming an AI ghost—it’s not easy - Ars Technica
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Jason Sudeikis Pays Tribute To His Late Uncle George Wendt: “I Love Him Dearly” - Deadline
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Invitation from Google hints at earlier than expected Pixel 10 release - PhoneArena
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Panel approves changes to enhance the flow of the game in men’s basketball - NCAA.org
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.